The Hidden Benefits of the Lindsay Clancy Trial

The nauseating Lindsay Clancy trial has had three beneficial consequences.

The first is the admiration from normal people towards the lone holdout inside the jury who refused to find innocent the confessed murderer of her own children despite the intense pressure from other jurors. Just like the 15 percent of people who resisted the enormous pressure for taking the toxic covid “vaccine.”

Respect.

It is immensely discouraging that we live in a world where liberals cry because Lindsay Clancy, who murdered her children, was not set free.

The second is clarity. The case has served to spotlight the AWFLS, as they have massed in support of the child killer. Normal men and women are aghast at some of these seemingly insane women who are crawling out from under rocks. It has been pointed out that a man who confessed to killing his children would have no support from other men, demonstrating outside the courtroom. For men, the Clancy trial has served as a welcomed test for men in evaluating possible relationships and/or weddings to weed out the lunatics. The message is clear: if the woman you are interested in supports the killer: Run! She may do the same to your children. It’s a good litmus test.

We have seen in the past few years that liberal women appear to act in an erratic, if not downright insane manner. And we have learned from the Pew survey that 56 percent of young liberal women have been diagnosed with a mental condition. The result of the survey is backed up by another survey and by numerous psychological studies. Now the Clancy trial gives men yet another reason to think twice before entering into relationships with liberal women.

The third is something I have pointed out, and that many people have finally become conscious of: there are many toxic mothers out there, some of whom murder their children. Heretofore, the image of mothers was that they were all caring, nurturing, and fiercely protective of their children. Such women were, and are, admirable. But, because of that image, we have turned a blind eye to the possibility that some women may carry out revolting acts against their children (such as convincing them to become transgender). Now, many persons have realized that this is not always so and that there are, and there have always been, women who murder their own children. Brutally so.

I recently did some digging in the statistics department and came across some surprising data that needs to be known. Namely, that 70 percent of filicide perpetrators are women, the average age of the victims being 6.2 years of age, around the time when they are most vulnerable. Of those victims, boys are twice more likely to be killed. There is also the matter of maltreatment and not just filicide. According to The Children’s Bureau and the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS), cases of a mother acting alone accounts for 31.8 percent of child maltreatment fatalities while a father acting alone is 13.7 percent.

One last point that needs to be made. It is immensely discouraging that we live in a world where liberals cry because Lindsay Clancy, who murdered her children, was not set free, but who laugh because Charlie Kirk was killed simply for politely talking to someone.

READ MORE from Armando Simón:

The Communist Warnings Conservatives Ignored for Years

The Fanatical Stupidity of Liberals With ‘Suicidal Empathy’

Going and Coming to Mars: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

Armando Simón is a retired psychologist, author of The Transgender Cult: Psychology, Politics, Religion and the Media.