Is There a ‘Mean Girl’ Culture in the White House?

Natalie Harp, a media advisor to President Trump and one of his most loyal aides, has become someone whose very presence appears to incite resentment in her co-workers. Through no fault of her own, Harp embodies qualities of youth, beauty, competence, faith, and proximity to power that others seem to find difficult to tolerate. Recently, their reactions have taken on a punitive edge that far exceeds ordinary workplace dynamics.

The Daily Beastreported that Harp’s White House co-workers discovered private notes she had written in 2023 to President Trump during or after Harp accompanied the president on a trip to Scotland and Ireland. The notes were personal expressions of loyalty and affection that were never intended for public consumption. But rather than respecting Harp’s privacy and dismissing the notes, the co-workers allegedly seized on the discovery, twisting her sincerity into a liability by turning her notes into an opportunity for mockery and internal sabotage.

In some ways, the cruelty of opening her up to mockery became a kind of bonding ritual for those who feel vulnerable.

The Daily Beast suggests that the culprits were a small cluster of “mean girls” (or guys) in the White House who found Harp’s notes in a stack of printouts — and passed them around like middle-schoolers at the cool kids table — transforming her private devotion to the president into an entertaining spectacle for their own resentment. Pretending that the reason Harp’s co-workers shared the personal missives was that — as The Daily Beast suggested — “they were worried about how close she was getting to the President,” the real reason is likely much less noble.

According to President Trump’s most vicious biographer, Michael Wolff, a longtime critic of the president has verified the White House source, claiming that “the notes are in the form of folded printouts which appear to bear Harp’s signature.” Wolff attempted to show the release of the personal notes was a principled act, suggesting on a recent podcast that “The relationship here is not a relationship that should exist in a professional setting… They are a red flag.”

The much more important red flag — the one that should worry all Americans — is the corrosive role that workplace envy now plays in many of our institutions. When resentment becomes the organizing principle of office culture, ordinary disagreements mutate into campaigns of sabotage. In the emerging mean girl dynamic, competence itself becomes a provocation. Harp’s experience is a symptom of a deeper social pathology — the impulse to destroy those who embody what others feel they lack.

Workplace scapegoating almost always emerges in moments of heightened uncertainty. They surface when people feel their status or their job security is at risk. The current economic anxieties in the country, combined with declining poll numbers for the president, geopolitical instability, and escalating media attacks, have all created the kinds of conditions that lead to situations like this one.

In such a culture, co-workers become more sensitive to comparison, increasingly threatened by competence, and more eager to locate a single figure who can absorb their fears. In these kinds of environments, insecure people seek someone to blame. The group begins to imitate one another’s unease, and that shared anxiety quickly hardens into a collective conviction that someone must be blamed. This is why workplace mobbing tends to appear when organizations are under stress, as the scapegoat becomes a symbolic solution to complex problems.

Mimetic theory suggests that scapegoating is never about the victim’s actual behavior but about the group’s need to restore a sense of unity and control. In this case, Harp’s loyalty to the president became the very trait that her colleagues sought to punish. The betrayal of their colleague was redefined as vigilance, and the violation of her privacy was reframed as concern. What happened to Harp is a clear example of mimetic convergence as co-workers imitate one another’s resentment until they collectively convince themselves that the problem is not the instability around them, but the woman who inadvertently symbolizes it. In some ways, the cruelty of opening her up to mockery became a kind of bonding ritual for those who feel vulnerable.

It is an especially sad commentary on our political culture that a co-worker’s devotion can be twisted into a weapon and a president’s trust betrayed for entertainment. Mimetic theory would describe this as a community in crisis — one that is losing the ability to confront its own fears without sacrificing someone who embodies what others cannot tolerate. The only cure for a pattern like this is moral clarity — leaders who refuse to indulge mob dynamics, and workers who are willing to resist the temptation to join the mob when resentment begins to spread. Without that courage, the cycle simply repeats, and another scapegoat will eventually be chosen to take Harp’s place.

READ MORE from Anne Hendershott:

Hannah Arendt’s Resonant Warning About Public Lying in the Age of Anthony Fauci

Has Support for Israel Become Gen Z’s Scapegoat?

The Borrowed Life of Gavin Newsom