{"id":645,"date":"2026-06-24T08:08:49","date_gmt":"2026-06-24T08:08:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?p=645"},"modified":"2026-06-24T08:08:49","modified_gmt":"2026-06-24T08:08:49","slug":"is-the-supreme-court-the-final-word-on-the-constitution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?p=645","title":{"rendered":"Is the Supreme Court the Final Word on the Constitution?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

I<\/span>t is astonishing how many Americans have been misled by the progressive law school fable that the Supreme Court is somehow above politics and should be placed at the apex of federal power as the final interpreter and owner of the Constitution\u2014at least as long as progressives have a majority of justices!<\/p>\n

Read more Israel\u2019s War Objectives Challenged by US-Iran Negotiations<\/a><\/p>\n

Sarah Isgur\u2019s new book, Last Branch Standing,<\/em> is an excellent example. But in this case, Social Sciences Dean at Hillsdale College, Paul D. Moreno, challenges the progressive myth in an excellent review. While giving her credit for recognizing that in fact the current Court is not led by some dominating conservative majority but is divided between three factions: 3 progressives, 3 moderate conservatives, and 3 conservatives \u2014 he goes to the heart of the matter.<\/p>\n

\n

Isgur is too prone to take contemporary judicial supremacy for granted. In her historical overview of the Court, she asks, \u201cHow did we end up with this Supreme Court \u2014 unique in the world \u2014 and perhaps the only one of the three branches that our Founders would recognize today?\u201d In fact, it\u2019s no longer unique in the world, and it is emphatically not the one that the Founders would recognize. I\u2019d say that no feature of today\u2019s current political system would surprise them more than judicial supremacy.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

In fact, Moreno continued, \u201cthe belief that the Court had the last word in constitutional interpretation is a relatively late development. It was not until 1958, in\u00a0Cooper v. Aaron<\/em>, a school-desegregation enforcement case, that the Court overtly stated that its interpretation of the Constitution was as much the \u2018supreme law of the land\u2019 as the Constitution itself.\u201d<\/p>\n

In that same era, my generation was specifically taught by Yale University\u2019s Robert Dahl\u2019s sophisticated empirical analysis that scores of Supreme Court decisions had actually been overridden by Congress over the years. More recently, the Civil Rights Act of 1987<\/em> even overruled the Supreme Court\u2019s\u00a0Grove City v. Bell<\/em>\u00a0civil rights decision by name.<\/p>\n

President Andrew Jackson not only refused to enforce the Supreme Court\u2019s\u00a0Worster v. Georgia<\/em> decision but also specifically argued that all three branches\u00a0equally interpret\u00a0the Constitution. As Moreno also noted, even Abraham Lincoln questioned whether the\u00a0Dred Scott<\/em>\u00a0decision was Constitutional as early as\u00a01857. Lincoln led a Civil War to overrule this Supreme Court ruling with his Emancipation Proclamation, which was confirmed by the 13th Amendment.<\/p>\n

It is no secret that with the coming of Wilsonian Progressivism, the New Deal, and the Great Society, things changed radically in favor of judicial supremacy. Progressive Supreme Court leaders like Earl Warren, William J. Brennan Jr., William O. Douglas, Louis Brandeis, and Thurgood Marshall led the way and were incredibly successful in nationalizing law, policy, and power over states\u2019 rights.<\/p>\n

Even with today\u2019s moderate judicial retreat from that earlier legal progressivism, some right-leaning intellectuals like Ramesh Ponnuru have argued that today\u2019s court has moved back too far toward states\u2019 rights. Ponnuru recognized that some state government policy conflicts with Washington \u201care inevitable and perhaps even healthy in our system.\u201d But at the end, he argues that national \u201crules must restrain those conflicts so that they do not undermine important national goods.\u201d Ponnuru argues that today\u2019s Supreme Court justices have become less and less willing to enforce limits on the states. These \u201chave read the specific rules narrowly and are moving toward a version of the dormant commerce clause that stops only those policies that explicitly target other states\u2019 economies.\u201d<\/p>\n

Today\u2019s conservative judges are simply considered \u201cskeptical of restrictions on the states.\u201d Those justices \u201ccommitted to originalism\u201d believe that \u201claws should be interpreted as the public understood them at the time they were enacted.\u201d Many even believe that the whole 20th-century interpretation of the commerce clause is simply \u201cnot in the text of the Constitution,\u201d nor can the document explain how to interpret it.<\/p>\n

Read more How a War With China Should Go<\/a><\/p>\n

These originalists, of course, are Justices Neil Gorsuch, Samuel Alito, and Clarence Thomas; and to a lesser degree, Brett Kavanaugh, John Roberts, and Amy Barrett. These are the more conservative judges who believe they are simply reversing what they consider were the extreme progressive court interpretations of the 20th Century. They particularly objected to courts moving from narrow interpretations of \u201cprocedural due process\u201d into a much broader \u201csubstantive due process\u201d that dramatically increased national power and limited 10th Amendment rights.<\/p>\n

The right critics justify a broader view of due process as necessary for free markets and commerce. While substantive due process originated there, the drastic increases in Washington\u2019s power over states more recently have limited state social policy powers \u2014 on issues such as marriage and the family, raising and educating children, on contraception and reproductive choice, on sexual privacy, on intimate relationships, and on abortion rights procedures \u2014 none of which have a national basis in the Constitution except by judicial fiat.<\/p>\n

As Moreno noted, Justice Clarence Thomas\u2019s 2022 suggested that much more needs to be done for a wholesale reconsideration of the Court\u2019s 20th-century rush from its original, limited Constitutional procedural interpretations into vague and too broad substantive misinterpretations, creating new \u201crights,\u201d often resulting in much of today\u2019s social disorder.<\/p>\n

In fact, from the very beginning, the Constitution has been a separation of powers instrument in which each of its five institutions \u2014 legislative, executive, judicial, states, and amendment \u2014 divides powers and rights where no institution has the final word and can challenge each other. Congress can pass new laws, states can mitigate and pass amendments, and the executive can interpret through enforcement actions to mitigate legal decisions.<\/p>\n

But for the last half-century or so, the courts have overreached their powers, and it has taken the other institutions time to slowly create the conditions for a federalist rebalance more consistent with the original Constitution.<\/p>\n

The way back requires interpretations and policies more consistent with the decentralized and balanced federalism that was built into the actual Constitution.<\/p>\n

READ MORE from Donald Devine:<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Declaration, the Constitution, and the Consent of the Governed<\/strong><\/p>\n

Can Liberty Survive Without a Soul?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Forthcoming Ideological Battle on the Right?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Donald Devine is a senior scholar at the Fund for American Studies in Washington, D.C. He served as President Ronald Reagan\u2019s civil service director during his first term in office. A former professor, he is the author of a dozen books, including his most recent,\u00a0<\/em>Thinking About Freedom and Tradition: Understanding the Philosophers Who Make the Case for Western Civilization; The Enduring Tension: Capitalism and the Moral Order; and\u00a0<\/em>Ronald Reagan\u2019s Enduring Principles;<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0and is a frequent contributor to\u00a0<\/em>The American Spectator.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Read more Herbert Hoover and the Declaration of Independence<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A most wonderful article<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":644,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[54],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-645","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-constitutional-opinions"],"yoast_head":"\nIs the Supreme Court the Final Word on the Constitution? - National Logistics Post<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?p=645\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Is the Supreme Court the Final Word on the Constitution? - National Logistics Post\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A most wonderful article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?p=645\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"National Logistics Post\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-24T08:08:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/?p=645#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/?p=645\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/af6e6ad9b3cf5bfe495dc5541ee6a5cc\"},\"headline\":\"Is the Supreme Court the Final Word on the Constitution?\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-24T08:08:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/?p=645\"},\"wordCount\":1131,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/?p=645#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/dee1a2347220d4012ee02dfe9e3e8163.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Constitutional Opinions\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/?p=645#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/?p=645\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/?p=645\",\"name\":\"Is the Supreme Court the Final Word on the Constitution? - National Logistics Post\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/?p=645#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/?p=645#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/dee1a2347220d4012ee02dfe9e3e8163.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-24T08:08:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/af6e6ad9b3cf5bfe495dc5541ee6a5cc\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/?p=645#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/?p=645\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/?p=645#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/dee1a2347220d4012ee02dfe9e3e8163.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/dee1a2347220d4012ee02dfe9e3e8163.png\",\"width\":1983,\"height\":793},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/?p=645#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Is the Supreme Court the Final Word on the Constitution?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"National Logistics Post\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/af6e6ad9b3cf5bfe495dc5541ee6a5cc\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationallogisticspost.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Is the Supreme Court the Final Word on the Constitution? - National Logistics Post","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?p=645","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Is the Supreme Court the Final Word on the Constitution? - National Logistics Post","og_description":"A most wonderful article","og_url":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?p=645","og_site_name":"National Logistics Post","article_published_time":"2026-06-24T08:08:49+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?p=645#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?p=645"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/#\/schema\/person\/af6e6ad9b3cf5bfe495dc5541ee6a5cc"},"headline":"Is the Supreme Court the Final Word on the Constitution?","datePublished":"2026-06-24T08:08:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?p=645"},"wordCount":1131,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?p=645#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/dee1a2347220d4012ee02dfe9e3e8163.png","articleSection":["Constitutional Opinions"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?p=645#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?p=645","url":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?p=645","name":"Is the Supreme Court the Final Word on the Constitution? - National Logistics Post","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?p=645#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?p=645#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/dee1a2347220d4012ee02dfe9e3e8163.png","datePublished":"2026-06-24T08:08:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/#\/schema\/person\/af6e6ad9b3cf5bfe495dc5541ee6a5cc"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?p=645#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?p=645"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?p=645#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/dee1a2347220d4012ee02dfe9e3e8163.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/dee1a2347220d4012ee02dfe9e3e8163.png","width":1983,"height":793},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?p=645#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Is the Supreme Court the Final Word on the Constitution?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/","name":"National Logistics Post","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/#\/schema\/person\/af6e6ad9b3cf5bfe495dc5541ee6a5cc","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com"],"url":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/645","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=645"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/645\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/644"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=645"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=645"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationallogisticspost.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=645"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}